Archive for the 'Logistics' Category

Retail Distribution Centres

Sunday, April 15th, 2007

North Americans are a buzz about the robust consumer spending throughout our continent. The picture is quite rosy for the established large-scale retailers who are seemingly on fire with sales given new found consumer wealth created by robust stock markets, soaring home prices, low-interest rates, etc. For the outsider, it looks like a simple equation, retailers simply find new products to sell get them out to the stores, sell out the product in record time and record volumes, everybody is happy.

While this may be true on some levels, the competitive environment clearly does not simply lie in the pricing and/or positioning of givens products. The supply chain of getting the product from the manufacturer (more often overseas) to the shelves of the retail locations is proving more critical than ever to the overall success of a retailer. A large part of the eventual success or lack thereof for these retailers is based on the intelligence and innovation of the supply chain and real estate minds within these organizations. We spend many of our days in strategy sessions with these people, reviewing the new challenges being faced and how to overcome inefficiencies while engaging in proactive initiatives designed to keep a given company ahead of it’s competitor(s).

One of the recurring themes that we see is the size of the warehouses increasing. In the past, 300,000 – 400,000 square feet was considered large for the Canadian market while in the US the figure was doubled. In Canada we are now in discussions more frequently with retail end users that are investigating distribution hubs of 1,000,000 square feet and up. This sizing poses several challenges to be strategically dealt with including the following:

  • Finding a piece of land that will allow for a single development of that size
  • Ensuring proper zoning and services exist and/or can be acheived by the developer/end-user
  • The size these buildings can get before they actually become more of a detriment to operate vs. advantageous
  • Whether rail access is available in relatively close proximity

The next 4 posts will address these items and some of the findings that have resulted.

Urban Redevelopment - “The Return From Suburbia”

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

The development of new industrial buildings on what is known as greenfield land (land that has never had any type of structure erected on it) is relatively straight forward to the extent that provided services and the proper zoning are in place and environmental studies and regulations are dealt with in a manner that is satisfactory to the governing bodies, one is free to construct a building provided that it is built to code and conforms to coverage allowances (the amount of allowable building area on a particular piece of land). 

As the demand for developable land continues to out-pace supply across Canada’s major centres including Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Toronto and Montreal, naturally causing increases in pricing, end-users and developers alike are forced to ask themselves the questions that ultimately lead to creative solutions. These questions are often found in the form of; “How am I going to get control/ownership of developable land at a reasonable price, located within the hubs of activity (namely airports and major cities), satisfy zoning requirements so that I can develop my required warehouse building in a time frame that is not too prohibitive based on the double digit return I expect on my capital”. The answer to what is clearly a complex question is more and more often found in the redevelopment of existing buildings located in urban centres throughout the country.

The redevelopment of existing industrial buildings and/or land sites upon which an industrial building once sat vs. Greenfield development is another undertaking entirely. A multitude of considerations and challenges are required to be examined and solved prior to engaging on redevelopment of these types of properties. Consider the following as examples: 

The City’s Vision For Land 

There is tremendous pressure on local Government within the major cities to rezone former employment lands (land that has been used to house commerce by way of retail, commercial or industrial) to residential in order to accommodate the ever-growing demand for housing within these urban areas. While cities do their best to maintain a palatable balance between the two for reasons varying from people needing a place to work that is within reasonable travel distance utilizing public transit, thereby eliminating the need for automobile reliance, to ensuring that the higher tax base payable by commercial uses and needed to fund infrastructure to keep the city viable, the residential argument often wins. The challenge then for developers and end users begins with actually finding a piece of land and/or building where they can maintain an industrial zoning in order to build.

Raising the Roof – The Clear Height Dilemma  

There are two main ways to redevelop existing land including knocking the existing structures down and starting from scratch and modifying a building to accommodate alternative needs. When redeveloping using the latter approach, we must remain cognizant that many of the urban industrial buildings were constructed to accommodate the true industrial era when manufacturing was king in North America and the generally accepted specifications of an industrial building were vastly different than today’s requirements. One of the most obvious and critical adjustments to these specifications has been the height of a buildings ceiling, otherwise known as the clear height. With manufacturing having experienced a major shift to other hemispheres on the globe, North America has truly become the land of distribution. The distribution/supply chain/logistics model then, relative to industrial buildings, requires the ability to stack product on pallets and in turn racks, as high as 30’ in most cases. Most of the industrial buildings of the industrial era had clear heights varying from 12’ to 18’ high. The question then is, what to do with a roof that is too low. “Raise It” you say…good answer. Although technology does exist throughout North America, the practicality has not yet become commonly acceptable in Canada. This is due to change in the coming years.

Environmental Clean-Up

Industrial buildings that have housed manufacturing concerns in the past often operated with environmental regulations that are not as stringent as today’s standards and while in most cases unintentional, these manufacturing processes often experienced spills and/or leakage of materials used in various processes and in many cases, partial rupturing of underground storage tanks. When these materials are mixed with moving ground water, the results have caused leaching throughout their site and those of neighbors.  Another challenge then for those seeking to acquire redevelopment properties is dealing with the results of environmentally hazardous soil that is discovered upon normal testing when properties are changing the hands of ownership. There are some terrific specialty firms that deal with these issues as part of their core-competency and developers and end users rely heavily on their skills and expertise to overcome these challenges.  

The trend towards redevelopment of urban industrially zoned properties to warehouse uses is here to stay and creates exciting possibilities for those contemplating this route as a solution for stated corporate objectives. With the correct guidance from those with experience navigating these waters, the process is enjoyable and is a great alternative.   

“Movin’ On Up” - The Supply & Demand Shell Game

Thursday, December 21st, 2006

As with consumers in general, end users requiring space within industrial buildings often seize the opportunity to participate in a flight to quality, otherwise known as “Movin’ On Up”. Many of the industrial buildings that have been utilized in past decades were constructed to standards and specifications that are not conducive to the demands and use types that are commonly seen in the market today. When tenants leave these older buildings in favour of newer and better-designed facilities, the buildings they leave are naturally placed into the overall pool of buildings that are considered part of vacancy for that period of time. Two things to consider in these situations are:

  1. Even though space is being absorbed in a newer building, that end user has left space behind which may very well be vacant. As such, one could consider that there was an absorption that occurred throughout the relocation. The facts are that unless the end user took space that was larger than the space they left, there was no true net absorbtion as they were simply trading facilities.  
  2. One of the rogue factors that has increasingly had an impact on the vacancy rates throughout the City of Toronto proper, is the conversion of what was once industrial or commercial space (known as employment lands), to another use entirely. One of the hottest topics and activities for developers throughout the last 3 – 4 years has been residential intensification and/or the redevelopment of industrial properties to a residential use or zoning. When an industrial building is redeveloped to a use that no longer houses employees, it is theoretically removed from the overall inventory of space.

It is clear to see that the real estate market depends on net overall growth of space required in order to maintain a healthy supply and demand balance.

Industrial End Users Blaze Trail To Non-Traditional Locations

Sunday, December 17th, 2006

There is an increasingly amount of end users who are now finding opportunities to locate to what was generally accepted in the past as outlying areas from the GTA. These locales include Brantford, Woodstock, Barrie, Guelph, Kitchener/Waterloo and London, Ontario. This flight to areas that are more accessible to many in the workforce should not have a significant impact on overall vacancies of the measurable areas in the immediate GTA. Developers are already monitoring the progress of new development throughout a much larger geographical area when considering the delivery/development of new buildings.

US Industrial Trends

Thursday, November 23rd, 2006

I came across and interesting article written by Gail Kalinoski of the Commercial Property News titled Orlando Industrial Market Booms. It is an interesting update on a very robust market in the SE United States.

East GTA Industrial Activity

Tuesday, September 19th, 2006

The construction of large industrial buildings are not a regular occurance in the GTA's East end. Belrock Construction is bucking the trend by building a 600,000 square foot (sq. ft.), 3 building development in Oshawa, Ontario. The first phase of the project of 375,000 sq.ft. will be completed in the spring of 2007. Two other buildings will then be constructed by 2008 and will total 150,000 sq.ft. and 75,000 sq.ft. respectively.

The occupant will be Pival International, an automotive logistics group providing just in time shipping to GM who are headquartered in Montreal, Quebec. The site is 41 acres, next to the the new GM plant being developed for the New Camaro.

The site was originally purchased for $100,842 per acre with GI or General Industrial zoning.